Oh look, they corrected it: The one I saw yesterday had four rows of pairs, with Cameron / Obama labeled “2000s” and Blair / Shrub — the latter (s)elected November 2000 and inaugurated in 2001 — labelled “1990s”; no Bill Clinton. (Topped by a correct “1980s”, Thatcher, Reagan.)
Not necessarily, if he’s played it right to get in position and then actually does some good then we can start having street parties again. It’s going to be suck it and see but no one could be worse than Blair was…
Nah he wasn’t but Blair still hasn’t been tried for war crimes when he should be and for ruining the countries prospects he is probably the biggest reason for the leave vote, if he hadn’t fucked up his terms we wouldn’t be in this position.
Haha but don’t forget there really is only one sensible one pictured. We’ve had an idiot dressed up to look sensible for the last few years.
Kirsty Dale True, it seems like going from half-bad to total disaster 🙂
Not entirely sure but I have suspected that Johnson is off the charts clever for a long time, and that the persona is an act.
Oh look, they corrected it: The one I saw yesterday had four rows of pairs, with Cameron / Obama labeled “2000s” and Blair / Shrub — the latter (s)elected November 2000 and inaugurated in 2001 — labelled “1990s”; no Bill Clinton. (Topped by a correct “1980s”, Thatcher, Reagan.)
But, Kirsty Dale​, does that make it any better?
I’d argue, on the contrary, that that would be even worse.
Not necessarily, if he’s played it right to get in position and then actually does some good then we can start having street parties again. It’s going to be suck it and see but no one could be worse than Blair was…
Brown wasn’t too popular, either?
Nah he wasn’t but Blair still hasn’t been tried for war crimes when he should be and for ruining the countries prospects he is probably the biggest reason for the leave vote, if he hadn’t fucked up his terms we wouldn’t be in this position.