20 thoughts on “Title

  1. Lars Fosdal​ Her and her political party cheated us out of Bernie and the reforms we needed
    She is a great choice for the top 10%
    I’m voting for the Green Party
    I’d rather see Trump win, I’m against him on all most all issues
    But the bottom 90% are going to get punished either way
    Trump will punish everyone

  2. Trump’s ineptitude has nothing to do with Clinton’s sex. If Trump were a woman or if Clinton were a man there would still be competition for the presidency.

  3. You want “experience”?

    Formed March 13, 1954; 62 years ago
    Preceding agencies
    Ministry of Internal Affairs
    Ministry for State Security
    Dissolved November 6, 1991 (de facto)
    December 3, 1991 (de jure)
    Superseding agency
    Federal Security Service
    Central Intelligence Service
    Committee for State Border Guard
    Foreign Intelligence Service
    Type State committee of union-republican jurisdiction
    Jurisdiction Soviet Union
    Headquarters Lubyanskaya ploshchad, 2, Moscow, Russian SFSR
    Motto Loyalty to the party – Loyalty to motherland
    Верность партии – Верность Родине
    Agency executive
    Vladimir Kryuchkov (last), Chairman of KGB
    Parent agency Central Committee of the Party
    Council of Ministers of the Soviet Union
    Child agencies
    First Chief Directorate (foreign intelligence)
    Second Chief Directorate (internal security and counterintelligence)
    Eighth Chief Directorate (ciphering and government communication)
    Chief Directorate of Border Forces

    now just what in the hell is HRC planning to do to protect us from Putin?? like, HONESTLY?

  4. Крыстафер Гомес What/whose is that list of experience? It needs better itemization, because now there are multiple lines where the context is unclear?

  5. oh yeah, and during those three months, the server had no encryption or protection of any kind – do you think the NCSC would have advised her to leave her servers unencrypted?

    do you think, Lars Fosdal, that by eschewing the counterintelligence outfit of the US federal government, specifically built in early 2001 to combat terrorism #hillaryclinton  is ready to lead a nation as technological as the USA?

    (obviously, later that year, the NCSC or NCIX, or National CounterIntelligence eXecutive, as it was initially named, wasn’t yet prepared to stop what happened in late 2001….)

    she can’t lead; she can’t delegate; she can’t protect; she isn’t forthcoming; she’s not honest; her family is in shambles… she’s a mistake.

  6. WTF does Putin’s resume have to do with the US election? As for the email server -where are the smoking guns? For all the leaks and publications – there hasn’t really been anything noteworthy published.

  7. Lars Fosdal​ my friend the point is our leader should defend us or at least be able to defend us– she is incompetent

    Did you know she put out a video in 2010 informing the state department that they should be more aware of cyber security threats?

    Meanwhile she’s using her husband’s old servers which were originally used and were still used for her foundation business that is an obvious merger of business and politics

  8. And don’t even let me bring up the fact that she was never part of the militia she will never become part of the militia she has no military intelligence or experience whatsoever

    Meanwhile every male u.s. citizen has to be a member of the militia between the ages of 17 and 45

    She never even joined the National Guard

    Hillary Clinton is a dire mistake

Leave a Reply