Feature request: Add support for Windows on 64-bit ARM CPUs

Feature request: Add support for Windows on 64-bit ARM CPUs

https://quality.embarcadero.com/browse/RSP-17983

9 thoughts on “Feature request: Add support for Windows on 64-bit ARM CPUs


  1. Let’s see how that turns out this time and then decide if it’s worth the effort. Until then I think the builtin x86 emulator will work just fine – otherwise that Windows version would be useless (just like their last try) if almost no application runs on it.


  2. Knowing how easily Microsoft abandons its efforts it would be foolish to rush to support WinOnARM. Emba has quite enough to work on as is.


  3. Lars Fosdal It could be a possibility that the VCL(ComCtl32) might not be supported natively on Windows on ARM, other than the x86 emulation. We should know more information at Build 2017 (May 10-12). And, it might be UWP only for native Windows on ARM. And, I still believe that with FireMonkey, it should be possible to develop an UWP application, if Embarcadero would be willing to make the changes in API calls to support pure 100% UWP (and I’m not talking about the Desktop Bridge). And, by supporting pure 100% UWP applications, this would also open up for deployment to the Xbox One, HoloLens and the Windows 10 IOT on ARM.


  4. Daniel Rail That is a very well made point. I fear you are right with regards to 64-bit on ARM.


    The real feature request will probably have to be to be able to make Windows Runtime based UWP .appx apps with Delphi.


  5. Fl Ko These articles seem indicate that the full Win32 APIs actually are natively available on Windows on ARM64 – and not just the Windows Runtime APIs? I wish there would be some definitive info on this soon.

Leave a Reply